South Carolina for Internet Freedom

Top Priority for SC: Set up Meetings

There aren't any public events yet, so the most important thing is to get meetings with Senators. Here's what you need to do:

  • Email edward_mercer@lgraham.senate.gov to meet with Senator Graham, a co-sponsor of PIPA, and call (864) 250-1417 to follow up.
  • Fill out this form, and call 843-727-4525 to meet with Senator DeMint.

Be polite and professional, and request a meeting on behalf of South Carolina for Internet Freedom (the folks in this forum) to discuss the PROTECT IP Act and SOPA.  Make it clear that you want to meet with the Senator during the January recess, and that you'll be bringing others from your group.  Have your calendar open when you call, so you can pick a time that works for you.  When finished, post a report-back. 

For example: "Hi, my name is ________, I'm with South Carolina for Internet freedom, and I'm calling to request a meeting with Senator _______ during the January recess.  The PROTECT IP vote is happening on January 24th, and I wanted the Senator to understand my concerns before the vote happens."


IMPORTANT: If you do get a meeting, post another message. That way others can join you in your meeting.  If there's any other specific information we should include in this post, message us and we can add it. 

Comments

  • The e-mail you provided is slightly off.
    It's edward_mercer@lgraham.senate.gov

  • edited January 2012
    I wrote to Jim DeMints office about this issue and here was his response:

    Dear Mr. Hart, 

    Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the Protect IP and SOPA acts. I appreciate hearing from you on this matter. 

    As you may know, Senator Patrick Leahy (VT) introduced S. 968, Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011 (PROTECT IP) on May 12th, 2011 which authorizes the Attorney General (AG) to commence: (1) an in personam action against a registrant of a nondomestic domain name (NDN) used by an Internet site dedicated to infringing activities (ISDIA) or an owner or operator of an ISDIA accessed through an NDN; or (2) if such individuals are unable to be found by the AG or have no address within a U.S. judicial district, an in rem action (against a domain name itself, in lieu of such individuals) against the NDN used by an ISDIA.  

    Hollywood and the music industry argue that this bill is aimed at protecting U.S. intellectual property from foreign "rogue" websites.  Although I am a strong proponent of protecting intellectual property rights, I am concerned that this bill would unnecessarily hinder U.S. internet and technology innovation.  For example, a U.S. website that has broken no laws may be subjected to intense federal scrutiny based upon a single accusation of infringement by a copyright or trademark owner.  Furthermore, I feel that this regulation limits the free speech rights that are crucial to a vibrant internet community.  

    Like you, I believe that the Internet is a vital tool for commerce and communication, and it has flourished without the heavy hand of regulation.  In the past decade, the openness of the internet has led to an explosion of innovation, the investment of hundreds of billions of dollars into our economy, and the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs.  


    Thank you again for sharing your views with me, and please feel free to contact me in the future about anything important to you or your family. It is an honor to serve you and the people of the State of South Carolina.

    Sincerely,

    Jim DeMint
    United States Senator

  • Here is Tim Scott's response to me

    Dear Mr. Hart:

    Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to H.R. 3261, the Stop Online Piracy Act of 2011. I appreciate your perspective on this important issue and the opportunity to respond. 

    This legislation, introduced by Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX), modernizes our criminal and civil statutes and provides law enforcement with more tools to protect American intellectual property from counterfeiting and piracy. Specifically, the bill enables the Attorney General to file an action against a foreign rogue site in federal court. If the court finds that a site is rogue, it may prohibit Internet Service Providers and search engines from linking or connecting users to the site. H.R. 3261 also establishes a new private resolution process to encourage out of court solutions to protect against the losses that result from rogue websites. The bill furthers these protective measures by increasing criminal penalties and fines for foreign and economic espionage, trafficking in counterfeit military goods, and trafficking in counterfeit drugs. 

    As you may know, H.R. 3261 has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee. While I do not serve on this committee, please know that I will closely monitor this bill as it moves through the legislative process. I certainly understand your concerns regarding privacy infringements and will keep your thoughts in mind should this bill come before the House for a vote. As technology evolves, we must ensure our laws adequately reflect these changes. However, it is imperative that our efforts to prevent online threats to economic creativity and theft of intellectual property are carefully balanced with our First Amendment rights.

    Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me on this important issue; I hope you will continue to do so in the future. If I can ever be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of my staff.

    For more information from Washington, please visit my website at www.timscott.house.gov and subscribe to my monthly e-newsletter.
    Sincerely, 

    Tim Scott
    Member of Congress
  • If I got a meeting with the Senator(s) would any of you come?
  • I would come. 

     

  • If this travesty passes, is there a way we can post how our leaders voted so we know who to vote out?
  • I would too Katina.
  • I would come.
  • I am down for going to Columbia to meet a senator. Tell me where and when.
  • If available, I would gladly attend a meeting in the Columbia area.
  • I will meet also.  Just let us know when and where.
  • I'm in, too.
  • I would absolutely attend a meeting with our senators - especially Senator Lindsey Graham who has sold the American people out with his endorsement of NDAA.  I would not be surprised to see him support this as well.  I am in for sure.
  • edited January 2012
    Oh that is right, he co-sponsored this as well.  So what does it take for us to bring treason charges against a government official?  Anyone know? 
  • @Sandy, I'm not sure what about Senator Graham's backing of this bill you believe constitutes treason. I am entirely against these acts, but that type of inflammatory instigation isn't going to solve anything. @IAmKatina, I live in Columbia, and actually know someone that works on Senator Graham's staff. I would attend, and if there's anything I can do to help set something like that up, let me know. 
  • I'd happily attend.
  • I would attend. Here is my letter to Lindsey:
    I am writing this to inform you of my opposition to Protect IP/SOPA.

    This legislation poses as severe a threat to my first amendment rights as gun control does to my second amendment rights.

    These bills clearly open the door for abuse and set a dangerous precedent. 

    As much as I hate liberal media, you won't find me calling for anything that even slightly resembles "State Control".

    Is there piracy and copyright infringement out there? Of course. Will these bills stop it? Of course not. The industries and corporations that these bills will supposedly protect have enough tools and lawyers at there disposal to handle the "crisis". I don't have the space here, but I could make a very strong case against these folks who have already abused the tools at their disposal. Now you want to enact ambiguously worded legislation opening the door to manipulation of the internet??

    Please stand up for both our Country and your constituents and insure the basic freedoms which this Country was built on are protected, not turned over to special interests who are more concerned with their Profit/Loss statements.

    Who are the two least trusted entities within our borders today? Probably the US Government and Corporate America. You would like for me to believe that these two groups can effectively and fairly manage censorship for the common good of all? I don't think so. 

    Senator Jim DeMint had this to say in response to a communication from a fellow constituent. He seems to have a pretty good grasp on the situation. Maybe you  should meet with him to get a better understanding of how your constituents feel about this matter?

    >>"Hollywood and the music industry argue that this bill is aimed at protecting U.S. intellectual property from foreign "rogue" websites.  Although I am a strong proponent of protecting intellectual property rights, I am concerned that this bill would unnecessarily hinder U.S. internet and technology innovation.  For example, a U.S. website that has broken no laws may be subjected to intense federal scrutiny based upon a single accusation of infringement by a copyright or trademark owner.  Furthermore, I feel that this regulation limits the free speech rights that are crucial to a vibrant internet community.  

    Like you, I believe that the Internet is a vital tool for commerce and communication, and it has flourished without the heavy hand of regulation.  In the past decade, the openness of the internet has led to an explosion of innovation, the investment of hundreds of billions of dollars into our economy, and the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs.  

    Thank you again for sharing your views with me, and please feel free to contact me in the future about anything important to you or your family. It is an honor to serve you and the people of the State of South Carolina.

    Sincerely,

    Jim DeMint
    United States Senator"
    >>

    Senator Graham, I hope you will reconsider your support of this legislation and instead uphold your promises to protect our freedom.


  • I would gladly meet!
  • Great job, everybody! Please keep those phone calls and emails rolling in, and if meeting requests don't seem to be getting much of a response, feel free to organize your own walk-in "meetings," at any time that you and a few friends can make it to one of the Senators' local offices. Our goal is to make sure the Senators know just how widespread and serious the opposition to PIPA is, and physically showing up at Senators' offices is one of the best ways to show just how concerned you are about the legislation. Keep up the good work!
  • edited January 2012

    Just say when

     

  • edited January 2012
    I will attend... Im tried of our elected officials making bad calls. I wonder if they exclude themselves from these laws as they have so many??
  • Is Tim Scott on the take?

     

  • I just sent an email to Graham. Let's see what comes of it...
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with Facebook Sign In with Google Sign In with OpenID Sign In with Twitter

Categories